One number for the board
A single site grade, 0 to 100 and a letter, that stands in for a stack of disconnected reports. The number leadership asks for each quarter.
For growth executives
One board-ready grade, tied to revenue
You want brand, channels, and revenue connected, and a single number you can defend. Audaeogives you one site grade and one trend line, with content gaps tied to the deals you win and lose. It turns AI visibility from a vague worry into a figure you can take to the board.
Free for ten pages. No credit card, no HubSpot account needed.
Why is AI visibility hard to report on?
Budget is spread across disconnected initiatives, the brand reads differently on every channel, and the return is unclear. When the board asks whether AI search is working, most teams have no single number to point at, only a pile of tool exports that do not add up to an answer.
Audaeo settles it with one grade and one trend line. Both roll up from page-level scoring, and both connect to your CRM, so the figure you report is grounded in the pipeline rather than in activity counts.
What is the number that moves each quarter?
Your AEO score over time. Each audit adds a point to the line, so progress is visible at a glance and the work reads as compounding, not one-off. Below, an example site climbs from a failing 46 to a 66 across six months of fixes.
AEO score
▲ 20 ptsHow do content gaps connect to deals?
On the CRM-enriched tier, Audaeo reads your won and lost deals and ties each site gap to a revenue question. Pick a question below to see the evidence from the CRM and the exact page gap behind it.
Ask your revenue data
42% of losses
Prospects cite unclear pricing as the top reason a deal stalls, yet the site never states a price or a starting tier.
Website gapNo pricing page
What do you walk away with?
Content gaps tied to revenue
The CRM connection maps site gaps to the deals you actually win and lose, so strategy is grounded in your pipeline rather than opinion.
Proof the work compounds
A trend line for AEO score, query coverage, and share of AI voice over time. Evidence the investment is moving, not a snapshot.
Where the lane is still open
Competitor benchmarking shows where rivals already own the AI answer and where you can still win it, so budget goes where it returns.
Proof from an executive who reported it
[PLACEHOLDER — one real proof point for this persona: a growth executive's board-ready grade and the ROI tie, with the revenue gaps the CRM connection surfaced. Gather with written permission before publishing. Until then this page ships no fabricated quote or logo.]
Common questions
What is the one number I take to the board?
The site grade: a 0-to-100 score and a letter, rolled up from every page scored across five dimensions. It is traceable to concrete signals, so it holds up under questions rather than reading as a vanity metric.
How does this connect to revenue?
The CRM-enriched tier reads your closed-won and closed-lost data and ties site gaps to deal outcomes. It answers why deals stall, who your buyers actually are, and what converts, then points at the pages responsible.
Can I show progress over time?
Yes. Trends track your AEO score, query coverage, and share of AI voice across audits, so each quarter you can show the line moving. That trend is the proof the work compounds rather than resets.
How much does it cost to see the number?
The first grade is free for ten pages, with no credit card. The full site is 149 dollars for up to 500 pages, and the CRM-enriched tier that ties gaps to revenue is 599 dollars.
Get the number you can defend
One grade, one trend line, gaps tied to revenue. Score ten pages free to start.