Two scores per page, side by side
The human score rates trust and clarity. The AI score rates schema, structure, and extractable facts. The gap between them is what you fix first.
You already know the buyer journey runs through AI answers now, and that the site has to work for a human reader and an AI agent at once. Audaeo scores every page from both sides, puts the human score next to the AI score, and hands you a named fix list for each gap. It is the only audit built to prove both.
Free for ten pages. No credit card, no HubSpot account needed.
You are asked to make the brand work everywhere at once: on the page a buyer reads and inside the answer an AI engine writes. Most tools measure one side. SEO suites grade ranking. AI monitors watch mentions. Neither tells you whether a specific page reads clean to a person and parses clean to a machine, or what to change when it does not.
That dual demand is the exact job Audaeo scores. A page can look polished to a reader and be near invisible to an engine, because its claims sit in an image, its structure has no schema, or its answer is buried six paragraphs down. You cannot fix what no tool will name.
Each page is scored 0 to 100 across the five CLEAR dimensions, from the human view and the AI view together. The scorecard shows the letter grade, the number, and each dimension split into its two scores. Below, an example site reads a B to humans on most dimensions and drops a full band on the agent side, which is where its citations leak.
The human score rates trust and clarity. The AI score rates schema, structure, and extractable facts. The gap between them is what you fix first.
Query fan-out decomposes a buyer question into five to eight sub-queries and shows which ones your site covers. "You cover 3 of 8" replaces "be more visible."
Every gap comes back as a content brief with a title, outline, key points, keywords, and schema. No blank page, no guessing scope.
robots.txt AI access, llms.txt, sitemap, schema, HTTPS, and canonical, checked and scored. The blockers that decide whether AI can parse your site at all, fixable this week.
[PLACEHOLDER — one real proof point for this persona: a savvy marketer's dual-perspective before and after, with the human and AI scores that moved and the pages they fixed. Gather with written permission before publishing. Until then this page ships no fabricated quote or logo.]
No. Audaeo tells you what to write, for whom, and why it matters, then hands your team a brief per gap. It is a diagnostic and a plan, not an AI copywriter. You keep control of the voice.
The human score rates how a person reads the page: trust, clarity, and whether the offer lands. The AI score rates how an answer engine parses it: schema, structure, extractable facts, and crawlability. A page can score well on one and badly on the other, and that gap is the work list.
The technical base overlaps, so HTTPS, semantic HTML, and a clean sitemap help both. AEO adds structured evidence, answer-first writing, schema, and coverage of the sub-queries an engine generates. You extend the work you already do, you do not replace it.
A ten-page audit runs in about three to five minutes. You enter a work email, get a magic link, and the grade, the per-page scores, and the fix list land back with no credit card and no HubSpot account required.
Ten pages, scored from a human view and an AI-agent view, with the fix list for each. Free.